So from what I understand, the artist confronting Anita Sarkeesian about art theft is now in talks to resolve the matter. I have the sneaking suspicion that what will happen is damage control and they may take advantage of her knowledge or lack there of when it comes to copyright laws. First off, fair use does not apply here. Anita Sarkeesian does not actually have an organization to speak of and they are not a charity. You can’t say really say that it’s for educational purposes, because Anita is not an educator and the art was used for a logo to raise money and not to educate. So it was used to obtain money. It’s been used in her lectures where she received money to come speak and she received a fair amount for that.
There is actually footage of Anita saying she dislikes video games and they are ‘groce’. Video games are a trivial issue I’ll admit but I’m reblogging because Anita is a con artist and a thief.